People’s Republic of Tear-That-Down

Our apartment is generally a quiet place. On any given night, you may hear water rushing through the pipes in the wall next to our bed. You may hear the mysterious plik-plik sound of our upstairs neighbor methodically dropping thumb tacks onto her floor from a great height (or so it seems).

You may also hear, without warning, a thunderous cacophony of dynamited concrete, metal and glass – the unmistakable sound of another building collapsing as our neighborhood is destroyed-and-rebuilt around us.

There is a pun among foreigners that China should be called 拆那 (pronounced “chai-na”), which literally means “tear that down”, given the rate at which its cities and towns are being ripped apart and redeveloped. Before coming to China, I thought this must be a hyped-up story: no place could possibly be changing its face so quickly. But I am not exaggerating when I tell you that, in the seven months that I have lived here, several square-block areas just around our apartment have been torn down, had scaffolding go up, had welding and cement-pouring occur all day and night, and then been magically unveiled as a shiny new shopping center or karaoke palace or what have you.

One Wednesday night in September I walked past an anonymous 3-story construction site near my apartment. That Friday night when I passed by again it was a brightly lit Dairy Queen with a line of people out the door. As if it had always been there.

Today I followed my usual path down a little street near our place on the way to work and realized that all of the shops lining it – places selling clothes, cheap needlepoint artwork, odds and ends – had been closed for a week. This means that within the next couple of months the blocks surrounding it will be leveled. No community meetings are held to discuss it (the very idea makes me laugh out loud!). No signs go up explaining this in advance, except for this one:

The spray-painted character next to this man is “chai”, meaning that this structure is soon to be torn down. The sign of the chai is all over Kunming; a dizzying array of foreboding graffiti promising imminent destruction.

The chai photos above were taken in mid-December. This is what that area looks like now:

Photo courtesy of RP

While this process is going on all over Kunming (and all over China), it is particularly noticeable in our neighborhood because, as I think I have mentioned, we live in what might be called “Downtown Kunming”; an area of office buildings and an increasing number of fancy shops and malls selling goods at prices that no one around here can possibly afford.

The government’s plan for this neighborhood is perfectly clear: this area is to resemble the downtowns of other cities in The New Asia; a shopping mecca, a place for tourists filled with Western or Western-style goods, a shiny facade of cheerful economic growth, a place where you cannot possibly say that the Chinese government is ill-intentioned. This isn’t a place that executes more people than the rest of the world combined! This is a place where you can eat KFC while surfing the internet wirelessly and buying Louis Vuitton!

It was not always this way in Kunming. My understanding is that 10 years ago this neighborhood looked much like the rest of Kunming, with a mix of small shops, restaurants, small apartment buildings and tangled residential warrens left over from a still earlier era of urban development.

The process of converting this from an average neighborhood to a glittering palace of Chinese-style capitalism that Kunming is desperately hoping will be mistaken for Hong Kong has been swift, although the writing (or the chai, as it were) has been on the wall for years. When RP and I were in Kunming three and a half years ago, the old Muslim quarter of the city was already being torn down. It is now erased, snuffed out by the foot print of half-empty shopping malls, save for a few Hui restaurants, a couple of Muslim bakeries, and a leftover Hui population who look distinctly out of place wandering among the Disney stores and Calvin Klein outlets (an impression that I’m pretty sure is intentional).

The last vestige of this earlier era in our neighborhood, the Bird and Flower Market, is now in its final days. An area that was once home to average Kunming residents, with a lively full-time market, was allowed to crumble into uninhabitability so that the government could swoop in and say that the shopping malls they are now building on top of it were really the only humane thing to do. The population of the area was relocated to parts of the city unknown, and the shops bricked over and replaced with sanitary food chains.

A soon-to-be-replaced building

The malls that have opened in this area in the past few months are like a caricature of Chinese-iness in a Western city; a Baby Gap or a Crate and Barrel below, but look at the Oriental pagoda-like accents on the floors above! It’s still China if it’s an American burger joint that serves spring rolls too!

I will leave you to look through the photos of this destruction below, but there are a few things to bear in mind while you look at them: first, what is my giant problem this development?! Surely it is the right of Chinese cities to develop as they see fit – fair enough. But there is nothing magical or inevitable about such reimagining of neighborhoods; these are massive redevelopment projects dictated by the government to sanitize these neighborhoods and get money out of what they have deemed to be the city’s prime real estate. This means, in the most classic fashion, turning this from a place where average people lived, worked and purchased goods into a place for the monied, and (hope against hope!) for foreigners to come see what a clean and friendly place China is.

On that note, another issue I have with this: the kind of development that this and all Chinese urban development entails is one from which the only conclusion to be drawn is that China does not have its own sense of an indigenous modernity. That is to say, the process of making things look modern in China is a process of making them look Western: Western design, Western goods, endless rip-offs of Western ideas. And in case you should think this is a new story in China, let me tell you that this is exactly the same process that was beginning to happen in China before the founding of the Republic in 1949 began the process of turning China, yet again, inwards.

It is this feeling that China has no memory that is played out again and again as it redevelops its neighborhoods and cities. Although Chinese people love to parrot the old canard about its 5,000 years of glorious unbroken history, you will be hard pressed to find this history in evidence in most of the country, and certainly in a city like this one. I firmly believe that, before the government realized that the Great Wall could be a foreign tourist attraction, they would have bulldozed it if they’d had the resources.

Walking around Kunming, you can see in progress the work of erasing the memory of the city bit by bit – a memory that itself goes back only perhaps a couple of decades when the last round of erasure occurred. And here’s the rub: this process will be effective because what is being created is not ugly, only inoffensive. What’s more, the open, carefully curated spaces where Westerners and early adopters can drink cappuccino and look out at the cityscape are, admittedly, attractive and familiar – and so confidently complete in their design that the memory of what was in their place only weeks or months before simply disappears. As if the city that existed before your current glass of imported red wine were being revealed as only a myth.

RP and I have a morbid 50 RMB bet going on the block of apartments across from us: he’s betting it will be torn down before we’re married this coming summer; I think it’s got some fight in it yet. Anyone want in?

Click photo below to view full album. I will add pictures to this album in the near future, so check back for more.

Photo courtesy of RP

4 thoughts on “People’s Republic of Tear-That-Down

  1. Think of it all another way…in 50 years (or less!) the new buildings will probably look decrepit and the so the “character” will be back. I somehow don’t recall what I saw of Kunming as having as much character as, say, the hutongs in Beijing and the old parts of Shanghai. But to many of the locals, I would imagine better plumbing, heating, kitchens etc may result along with Louis Vuitton-at least until they fall apart too? Isnt that what happened to Detroit and most of the US cities? Will urban living as Jane Jacobs described it survive anywhere?

    • It’s true that this will all fall apart as well, but I don’t really have a sentimental notion of “character” meaning “old”, or that “old” means “good”. What I mean is that the development going on in Chinese cities is not superficial – it is fundamentally changing the face of these cities and who is allowed to inhabit which areas of them. These areas could have been preserved and their utilities upgraded for the people inhabiting them, but instead those people were relocated and their former homes are being razed.

      Everyone deserves a better standard of living, but the government uses the excuse of “standard of living” to hide all manner of evils – even as we speak they are planing to demolish Kashgar with the excuse of making it “earthquake safe”, when really it is just a convenient reason for them to organize Muslims into more reasonable chunks so that they can keep an eye on what they have decided is a suspicious population.

      In these situations of such tremendous urban change, the burden ought to be on the government to show that they are not simply creating more areas of ostentatious wealth for increasingly wealthy people, further stratifying a society whose income inequality and differential standards of living have skyrocketed in the past 30 years. I don’t really think we should need to give the government the benefit of the doubt here.

  2. I hear what you are saying but apart from the obvious extremes like Kashgar, this seems to be a pattern of development outside the US. The inner core of the city becomes the elite location with its skyscrapers, malls etc so the less affluent are relocated-best case to “better housing” (projects/”council estates”) that is good for maybe 5 years and inevitably decays with terrible crime, family structure deterioration and so on. In the US, of course, the opposite is true, with the less affluent left behind in the decaying core-or in the horrible projects- while the more affluent move out, with new schools, infrastructure etc following them. So I find this all yet another example of China imitating the bad choices made in the west…As for “character”, I see little of it that is new; somehow the patina of age and use is tied to it…and it also somehow usually always seems to represent a more human scale than what replaces it. And I think that is alot of the tragedy of what replaces much of the old, whether for rich or poor. The new communities have bigger buildings that encourage doors being kept shut and locked, rarely used outside space (verus stoops or their equivalent and hanging out on the street) more segregation of services and housing so that housing feels more isolated and less social. Oy, I could go on about this but I take it that you are hurting enough from what you are witnessing. I could say the same right here in NYC except that the melting pot phenomena here not not to mention our laws keep Kashgar type situations from happening (but think deep south pre-Civil Rights–must have been some of this there)

  3. Pingback: Caution: Haiku Ahead « BirdAbroad

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s